- Five original fabric designs, with subtle gaming motifs inspired by your favourite games
- Rock your favourite design as a button-up shirt, or a skirt (and yes, the skirt has pockets)!
- Inclusive sizing range - S-4XL for the shirts, and 2-20 (US) for the skirts
- Made from 100% cotton, for comfort and breathability
- Ethically and sustainably manufactured
See all my movie reviews.
Dunkirk - This is a fantastic Christopher Nolan movie, but not one I want to see multiple times. Okay, maybe one more time, but that's it.
The story is a slice of the evacuation at Dunkirk, the famous retreat of British (and French and Belgian) soldiers from France at the opening of WWII. While French soldiers held Germany at bay, Britain evacuated over 300,000 soldiers after expecting to only be able to rescue 30,000 or so. The evacuation was assisted by some air cover and by owners of small crafts, such as motor boats and so forth, taking the 25 mile sea trip to France and back. The beach was under attack a lot of the time.
The movie presents one week of the story of a foot soldier making several attempts to gain safety on a ship, interspersed with one day of the story of a civilian motorboat owner who travels to France to pick up some of the soldiers, interspersed with one hour of a pilot providing air cover. All stories converge by the end.
The interspersing of the stories was good in theory, but a little confusing due to the shifting time frames. There is no sensationalizing the war, either for or against. The stories are about fear, desperation, heroism and tragedy and survival, and how these are instantiated in humans. It's a war movie with little in the way of fighting; mostly it's about ducking and covering and running. But it's also about bravery and morality. It is not presented as a traditional story.
The acting and directing are sensational, and so is the cinematography. Most sensational is the sound, which heightens the gripping visuals and makes them either pathetic or harrowing. Very beautiful, often educational, and a real demonstration of what movies can be. I can't remember if there are any women in the movie.
The Big Sick - The best rom-com I've seen in quite a while, this was very funny and quite heartwarming. Written by and starring Kumail Nanjiani (Silicon Valley), it tells a fictionalized version of how Kumail met his American wife (played by Zoe Kazan) and the difficulty he/they endured from his parents (played byAnupam Kher and Zenobia Shroff) and (to a lesser degree) her parents (played by Holly Hunter and Roy Romano). The central part of the movie is a) the fact that his parents reject her because she is not Pakistani and b) that he spends a lot of time in the hospital with her parents when she suddenly falls into a coma ... after he had allegedly already broken up with her.
It's funny and it's touching. It's well acted and directed. But mostly, the script is great. It's funny. Worth seeing, especially on a date.
Frantz - A reworking of a very old movie, this tells a story set just after WWI. A German woman goes every day to the cemetery to put flowers on the grave of her fiance Frantz who was killed in the war, and one day she meets a man ... a French man .. who also starts putting flowers on the grave. She is living with her former fiance's parents, and they are all grief-stricken. The Frenchman shows up, but anger and intolerance runs high. Until he says how he was great friends with Frantz and can't get over his death. This is kind of believable, since Frantz was a humanist, pacifist, and Francophile before the war. But ... what kind of relationship did this guy really have with Frantz?
As a modern viewer, our immediate suspicion is that the guy was Frantz's lover, something not even considered or asked by the protagonists in the movie. The movie confirms some things and then goes in other directions, and then in yet other directions. Intolerance runs on both sides of the border, lies are condemned but met with other lies, and who knows where it will all end up. Will they get together?
The movie is beautifully shot, costumed, and acted. The direction is lovely. It was enjoyable. However, it suffers from a few flaws that are the result of heavy handedness by the director. I will give a teeny example.
One of the scenes in Germany has this young Frenchman, all alone, while the German patrons, who have previously expressed their contempt for all people French, stand in a bar and sing their national anthem out of respect for Germany's soldiers. The Frenchman looks lost and even frightened. In the hands of a more competent director, we would expect to see the young lady at some future time in the movie, say, pass by a sports stadium or train station where French people are singing the national anthem. That would display the dichotomy without descending into heavy handedness. Instead, we see a scene where she is all alone, while the French patrons, who have previously expressed their contempt for all people German, stand in a bar and sing their national anthem out of respect for France's soldiers. Come on. I actually laughed out loud at this and said "Come on!" in the movie theater. And this kind of thing happens again and again. The Frenchman knocks on her (fiance's) parents door, and then later we see her knock at his family's door in an eerily similar shot. And on and on like this.
The director also shoots mostly in black and white but fades into color during certain scenes, which had the potential to be lovely (as it was in Pleasantville, Wizard of Oz, and other movies), but ended up also feeling heavy handed and obvious, essentially adding nothing to the movie that wasn't already patently obvious from the settings and story.
Honestly, I would have thought this was the director's second or third film, but it seems he has been making movies since the late 1980s. So he should know better.
Despite these misfires - and the fact that no blame is assigned to anyone for the war, it just kind of happened - the movie is otherwise lovely and sweet, with a story that really picks up and captivates you (especially after the first major reveal).
Blade Runner 2049 - It's good, although maybe not as good as it could have been. It fits seamlessly in with the first movie, without being a retelling of that movie, which is about as well as one could hope for.
The first Blade Runner had its faults - a little too much staring at visuals, a little undeveloped romance (even a little rape-y), a few plot-holes and inconsistencies - but it was beautifully filmed and acted, had an intellectual script unlike any other science fiction movie since 2001, and created a genre and look for many other movies to copy. This one doesn't really break any new ground; if anything, it feels like it inhabits the same space as Ghost in the Shell 2017. However, it has a few unique twists on the hero/destiny journey which make it rather brave in some ways. I suspect that its ending is a reason that it didn't perform overly well in the box office, but actually its ending is just right when you think about it.
As for its acting, visuals, plot, and directing, they're all good. I was confused about certain elements of the movie - how can androids have babies / grow up from being babies? What kind of biological functions do they have? Do their cells wear out? Do they go through teething, adolescence, and puberty? What do they eat, do they eliminate, and how do they metabolize? None of that makes any real sense.
I have to see it again to really get some of the confusion cleared up. In any case, it's certainly worth going to see.
Stranger Things (season 2) - Well, I just saw it and it blew me away, much like the first season did. There is really not much to say about it. It's a great story, starts off a little slowly for the first few episodes like last season, and then gets rip roaring. There are a few new characters and they are all fantastic.
The show is now part Andromeda Strain, part Aliens, and part Harry Potter. If it has any fault, it feels so neatly wrapped up that I can hardly imagine a need for another season. These two were just perfect.
I have been recently thinking about the games I usually say are my favourite, as in my "top 5 RPGs" or whatever, and thinking about how this list overlaps with the games that I have played again and again.
What I have noticed is the lists don't really overlap.
So, my favourite game and RPG is probably FFVII, but in actual fact, I actually haven't played this game through in maybe 15 years now. Is it really the game that I should say is the "greatest"? Is that really what I think, or am I really saying "the game I have the greatest nostalgia for is FFVII"?
I don't think it is all about nostalgia though, because I only played MGS through for the first time 5 years ago, and I honestly think that that game ranks right up there in my top list of games, and in fact, I have only played it through once.
Is this honest? Do we need to have played a game many times for it to be in our top list? When it comes to films, all the films I like the most will be films I have chosen to watch quite a number of times... but with games, maybe it isn't the case.
Perhaps this is down to the amount of time it takes to complete a game, the investment, compared to a film. But even with my favourite books, I have read them a number of times, though probably not all of them....
And then there is the really weird case of games that sucked hours and hours away from my life, but don't even appear on my tops lists. RPGs that I put way down the list but which I played every last bit of juice from them, and at the time must have really enjoyed them or got something from them.... FFVIII for example- I played that to death over a full year, or Age of Empires, or Street Fighter Alpha 3, or Fifa 97, or Altered Beast, all of these I played loads, more certainly than MGS yet MGS ranks above them for sure in my estimation.
Image used for criticism under "Fair Use." |
Alone he rushed into his enemies,
How he saved his homeland,
I've heard legends of that man,
He ran the breadth of the land,
Ruining all he touched to rubble,
I've heard legends of that man,
I've heard legends of that man,
Revered by many, I too, revere him,
Feared by many, I too, fear him,
Now, that man,
Is near to me,
Now, that man,
Stands by me,
Now, friends are with me,
Some, once heroes,
Some, mortal enemies,
We shine ever brighter."
The Super Smash Bros. series, whatever iteration you've played, serves as more than just a fighting game, but as a tribute to all that Nintendo has accomplished thus far. Nintendo is to video games what Disney is to animation. Both excel at crafting revolutionary entertainment for audiences of all ages, with reputations of high quality and satisfaction. The characters brought about by these companies have also entered the public consciousness of storytelling and art. Many, need no introduction.
The lyrics you've just read belong to the theme of Super Smash Bros. Brawl, a version of the series for the Nintendo Wii. The song was composed by the ineffable Nobuo Uematsu of Final Fantasy, whose lyricism has graced "Aria di Mezzo Caraterre", "The One-Winged Angel", and "Liberi Fatali." His theme brings a rather mature and exalted mood to the game. The roster of Nintendo characters aren't simply ones who have been made up on the spot, but world-famous icons who's feats have entered the annals of video game history, Mario, Luigi, Kirby, Link, Samus, Pikachu, Donkey Kong, Zelda, Fox McCloud, Bowser, Pit, Peach, Marth, Ganondorf, Mewtwo, and even R.O.B. The Robot. The song is reminding players that they are fighting with and against the characters who've helped to craft video games as we understand them. That is something to be both honored and feared. Manaav Goyal of Always Nintendo, has spoken on the variety of interpretations in these lyrics,
"The story behind the song is one that can be interpreted in many ways. A clear one is that the lyrics are in the point of view of one of the fighters in the game, stating how these are noble heroes, who I am willing to fight with and against. Another interpretation could be that the song is about the fierceness of the fighters in the game. The song is in E major, which as stated by Austrian composer Anoton Bruckner, "is frequently associated with contemplation." This statement mirrors the song well, as the story does follow a man observing his relationship towards the champions, and what they truly are to him."
As far as fighting games go, and I've played my share, the Super Smash Bros. series is something special. For one, there is no bar of HP that determines how many hits one can take. Rather, each hit you take racks up a percentage, the higher your percentage, the more likely you are to be thrown out of the arena. The battle is won by the person who can throw his opponents out of the area x number of times (depending on the number of lives one has). So the game becomes a strategy of knocking the others out of the arena as fast as possible. This can helped or stalled by the various arenas, which include the Mushroom Kingdom, Pokemon Stadium, and Hyrule Castle. Numerous items can also be picked up or thrown, from Pokeballs, to Fire Flowers, to Hammers, to Ray Guns. Pokeballs being my personal favorite, if only for their random variety. Though what truly makes Super Smash Bros. worthwhile, and arguably one of the finest fighting games out there, is the multiplayer option. Games can devolve into a four way battle royal, in which it can be difficult to tell who is hitting what and where. This chaos can allow for a number of things to happen, and at times, the winner won't always be clear cut. I have to admit that I usually button mash when I play, which can be fun at times, but strategy is what will save you in the long stretch.
Super Smash Bros comes from the mind of Masahiro Sakurai, who also directed the Kirby series. Satoru Iwata, the current director of Nintendo, reflected on the creation of the series with Sakurai in an interview. The prototype was initially called Dragon King: The Fighting Game, the idea of using Nintendo characters came in when Sakurai realized that for the 64 console, a degree of character development was needed. Since Nintendo already had a set of popular characters, Sakurai thought it expedient to select from them instead of making new ones from scratch. The usage of Nintendo characters was initially met with resistance by fans, since making these beloved heroes fight one another didn't sound very appealing. History has proven otherwise. Even non-Nintendo characters who have appeared on Nintendo systems were later added to the roster, Sonic, Mega-Man, Solid Snake, and Pac-Man. Sakurai has emphasized how Super Smash Bros is supposed to resemble a once-in-a-lifetime experience, a game that changes every time you play it, as he said, "The appeal of Smash Bros. lies in the fact that it offers ever-changing entertainment born of chance and player improvisation..."
Nintendo has come a long way since its humble beginnings in 1889 as a company that sold hanafuda playing cards. With their leap into video games during the 1970's, well, you know: Donkey Kong, NES, Super Mario Bros, Nintendo Power, Duck Hunt, Legend of Zelda, Metroid, Punch-Out, SNES, Super Mario Bros. 3, StarFox, Game Boy, Pokemon Red and Blue, Nintendo 64, Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, GameCube, Fire Emblem, Game Boy Color, Super Metroid, Pokemon Silver and Gold, Game Boy Advance, Final Fantasy VI, Nintendo DS, Mario Kart, Chrono Trigger, Nintendo Wii, Twilight Princess, et cetera, et cetera.
It is also said that the word "nintendo" means "leave luck to heaven", well, maybe there's something to that.
Bibliography
Goyal, Manaav. "Behind the Notes: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Theme." Always Nintendo, June 21, 2014. Web. http://alwaysnintendo.com/behind-notes-super-smash-bros-brawl-theme/
Sakurai, Masahiro. Interviewed by Satoru Iwata. "Iwata Asks: Dragon King: The Fighting Game." Nintendo. Web. http://iwataasks.nintendo.com/interviews/#/wii/ssbb/6/0
Sakurai, Masahiro. Interviewed by Satoru Iwata. "Iwata Asks: Super Smash Bros Brawl: Once In A Lifetime." Nintendo. Web. http://iwataasks.nintendo.com/interviews/#/wii/ssbb/6/2
"Super Smash Bros. Brawl Main Theme - Lyrics." YouTube, June 29, 2014. Web. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtyQ7HqHlqs
System Requirements
Download The Game Here
• Play as Fury, a mage who must rely on her whip & magic to restore the balance, between Good and evil on Earth.
• Harness Fury's magic to unleash her various forms, each granting her access to new weapons, moves plus more.
• Explore an open-ended, living, Free-form game world in which Fury Moves back and forth between environments.
• Defeat the new Seven Deadly Sins and their Servants who range from mystical Creatures to degenerated beings.
• Expansive Post-Apocalyptic environments that take the Player from the Heights of heaven & to the Depths of Hell.
Included Content
♢ Click or choose only one button below to download this game.
♢ View detailed instructions for downloading and installing the game here.
♢ Use 7-Zip to extract RAR, ZIP and ISO files. Install PowerISO to mount ISO files.
(Your PC must at least have the equivalent or higher specs in order to run this game.)
• Processor: AMD FX-8320 (3,5 GHz) / Intel i5-4690K (3,5 GHz) or better processor
• Memory: at least 8GB System RAM
• Hard Disk Space: 25GB free HDD Space
• Video Card: GeForce GTX 660 / Radeon R7 370 with 2 GB VRAM or better graphics
If you have any questions or encountered broken links, please do not hesitate to comment below. :D
Our hero does . . . something . . . in celebration of his victory. |
Approaching the titular fortress. |
This is infuriating. I don't know why some NPCs do it and some don't. |
Manatar had good stats, but he wasn't with us for long. |
Oh, boy. Here we go. |
The manual gives you the formulas but not the effects. |
A scroll in the game tells you which words correspond to which effects. |
Where did Jarel get the key to Ishar? |
Blasting dwarf-bandits with "Lightning." |
I never learned most of these spells. |
A rune tablet in an area that causes blindness the moment you enter. |
When there's a potion called "Transform from Pig" and you find a pig, it's not hard to figure out what to do. |
I was reluctant to get rid of Khalin, but I figured Morgula must be special in some way since I had to go through so much trouble to get her. Sure enough, although she's weak as hell and her physical energy depletes while you watch, she has a spell called "Anti-Krogh." After I won the game and was doing my usual post-game research, I found that several web sites claim that Morgula is Krogh's mother, but I don't know where they get that, as her name appears nowhere in the backstory or in any of the NPC dialogue.
How do you turn down that kind of appeal? |
A lever puzzle took much of the time in the final dungeon. |
Anybody want to take a guess? |
Why does it look like medusa is a statue? She's supposed to turn people into statues? |
Poor dragon looks like he's cramped. |
After the dragon was a door we had to be wearing our robes to enter . . .
This is the first I've heard of Krogh starting some kind of cult. |
. . . then a corridor full of individual fights with spellcasters.
Killing wizards in the final corridor. I thought this was Krogh at first. |
The evil Krogh. Fortunately, Morgula has a spell called "Anti-Krogh." |
One element of the game that I never solved: there's a sword in a stone that was supposedly left there by Jarel when he swore off violence. Despite the message, I couldn't pull it out at any level or with the highest strength statistics.
Any ideas? |
- 3 points for the game world. I like the layout, but otherwise it's a generic high-fantasy place with a generic high-fantasy quest. 1992 CRPG addicts are no longer satisfied with vaguely-described evil overlords trying to take over the world just because they're evil.
- 3 points for character creation and development. There's no creation process, just an assemblage of party members from the NPCs you find across the land. Development is quiet, almost invisible, and besides those of wizards and warriors, the game really doesn't call upon the varied skills of its other classes.
- 4 points for NPC interaction. There are a few fixed NPCs who provide hints and items, and then there are the NPCs who can join the party. I'll allow a point for the uniqueness of Ishar's approach to alignment, where party members must vote to admit or expel new members, and apparently you can order one NPC to kill another, perhaps creating ramifications down the line (I never explored this), but none of it amounted to anything.
A few unnecessary hints do not constitute much in the way of "RPGs." |
- 2 points for encounters and foes. There aren't really any non-combat encounters, and monsters are generic high-fantasy denizens with the standard types of attacks. They're not even named on-screen. I thought the respawn rate was useful.
Here was a powerful thing from inside the final dungeon. |
- 2 points for magic and combat. Even if I'd bought all the spells, I don't think they really would have afforded much in the way of combat "tactics." There isn't much to do in combat but attack, cast, and keep an eye on the related meters. The party deployment grid is mostly wasted, and you can't even do the "combat waltz" or other strategies common to Dungeon Master-style games.
- 4 points for equipment. You have a reasonably good selection of weapons and armor, with numbers denoting their relative effectiveness. The potion system isn't bad except that you only have one flask.
This shop in Elwingil offers the best weapons and armor. |
- 6 points for the economy. It remains relevant to the end, and I like the way that it forces you to make tough choices throughout the game. It just lacks a certain complexity that I would need for a higher score, plus perhaps more of a "money sink" in those attribute trainings.
- 2 points for a main quest with some sub-quests but no side-quests. There are no alternate endings or player choices.
- 6 points for graphics, sound, and interface. The graphics and sound are some of the best we've seen, just about perfect for the scale and nature of the game. I particularly appreciated the ambient sounds (including a murmur of voices in the taverns that I came to believe was "I'm riding down to Livermore with some recruits"). The music is suitably epic, though in my case turned off. The interface was only okay; too much mouse, too little keyboard.
- 6 points for gameplay. It has some minor nonlinearity and minor replayability (with a different party configuration). It's almost perfect in its challenge (including its enforcement of limited saving) and its length.
Noticeably distinguished in the graphics area, Ishar: Legend of the Fortress plays almost as well as it looks . . . Perhaps the downfall of Ishar is its simplicity; you begin to wish for more activity, interaction, and involvement, more problems and less roaming . . . Certainly a valiant effort by Silmarils and, if they can learn from this, a firm foundation for a sequel.
Does this really add that much? |
Silmarils will have plenty of opportunities to continue to improve on this system. Ishar 2: Messengers of Doom will be along in 1993 and Ishar 3: The Seven Gates of Infinity in 1994. We also might have them for Robinson's Requiem (1994) depending on my decision on the genre. After that, Silmarils changes its focus to action games and ultimately goes out of business in 2003.
Although some commenters have suggested a certain amount of "Frenchiness" to this game, I think it's safe to say that we've long-since exited the era of truly outré French titles like Mandragore (1985) and Tera: La Cité des Crânes (1986). Instead, Silmarils seems to be following early-1990s Germany by producing copies of successful American games, albeit with some of their own twists. I'll miss the bizarre nature of the 1985-1989 French "golden age," but then again there are still a few titles on my clean-up list.
I gave the choice of the next "upcoming" game to Sebastian, who designed my banner, and he opted for Lands of Lore (1993). That'll be along in a few games. Next we'll finally take a look at Planet's Edge.